Can a CPA or Tax Preparer Stay Involved After Referring an IRS Case?
One of the most common concerns about referring an IRS matter is what happens next.
Does the referring CPA or tax preparer lose visibility? Does the controversy firm take over the entire client relationship? Does the original professional stop being involved?
It does not have to work that way.
The Roles Can Be Separate
A taxpayer can have one professional handling routine tax preparation or accounting and another handling a specific IRS controversy engagement.
The controversy matter can be narrowly scoped while the originating firm continues doing the work it normally performs for the client.
That is the model Zero Fluff Books uses for professional referrals unless the parties agree to something different.
The Original Professional Often Has Important Information
The referring professional may have years of history with the taxpayer. That can include:
Tax return workpapers
Bookkeeping records
Basis schedules
Entity history
Prior elections
Financial statements
Payroll or owner-compensation history
Background on transactions the IRS is questioning
That information may be important to the controversy matter, even though the originating professional is not managing the IRS case.
Authorization Matters
If someone is going to represent the taxpayer before the IRS, the taxpayer must authorize an eligible representative for the applicable matter. Form 2848 is commonly used for representation. If someone only needs authority to receive or inspect specified tax information and is not representing the taxpayer, Form 8821 may be appropriate.
Separately, tax professionals should be careful about sharing client information between firms. Tax return preparers may be subject to federal restrictions on the use and disclosure of tax return information, and other confidentiality or professional rules may also apply.
The practical rule is simple: do not assume that a referral automatically authorizes unrestricted sharing. Establish the appropriate taxpayer permissions first.
What Staying Involved Can Look Like
The referring professional does not need to become a second case manager. Involvement can be limited to the areas where the professional adds value.
For example, the accountant may answer a question about a return position, provide a reconciliation, explain a bookkeeping entry, or help identify where supporting documentation is located.
The controversy practitioner can handle the IRS communication, case strategy, response package, and representation.
Communication Should Be Intentional
A good referral relationship establishes expectations up front. The taxpayer should know who is responsible for the controversy matter and who remains responsible for the underlying accounting or tax work.
The professionals should also decide what status information will be shared and how frequently, subject to the taxpayer's authorization.
This keeps the client from becoming the messenger between two firms.
A Referral Should Not Create Competition
The purpose of a professional referral relationship is to solve the client's IRS problem, not to replace the firm that made the introduction.
ZFB's professional-partner model is designed around that distinction. The controversy engagement can remain separate from the client's existing tax preparation, bookkeeping, accounting, and advisory relationship.
Direct Referral or White-Label Support
Some firms want ZFB to engage directly with the taxpayer for the controversy matter. Others want back-end analysis, strategy, or drafting support while remaining more involved themselves.
Both models are available depending on the facts, professional responsibilities, and scope of the engagement.
Build the Relationship Before You Need It
You do not need to wait until a client has an urgent IRS deadline to establish a controversy resource.
Learn more about the ZFB Professional Partner Program. If you already have a client who may need representation, you can submit a referral for review.
Comments